The cosmological theory on " a Complete Time and Relativity of Energy " has been formulated with usual vocabulary and it began
rational is expounded
according to an empiric ascertainment, which a lot of philosophers have made it from ancient years and also is not accidental. Modern researchers were forced to make
this philosophical ascertainment in last century in
order to they describe the Universe with the theory of Big Explosion. Experience shows us that
exist resemblances and common elements in things of in-depth space and time.
This means, that through observation in most near things we can educe
information about the most distant things from us and about not visible things.
(In an other relative work I explained easily this our cognitive possibility
and this work accompanies and supplements the cosmological theory).
When we place the question about the beginning of the Universe and substance of things, we can not avoid certain general
notions. We use words such as the Universe, space and distance, time, matter, beginning, finish, movement, action etc. Certain terms emanate from newer
discoveries or were differentiated in course
of time. Some words such
as are gravity, energy, radiation, field, particle, matter in more
detail about its structure and many other key-words.
These are words, that from first thinking do not appear with the all relations,
that notions have one with other. They did not result theoretically / rationally and did
not formulated fast all together after a growth in some theory or in head of
only one thinker. The notion of these words formulated by accidental way and priority. They were used with their most obvious traits and acquired more
meanings in course of time. Same as the bigger part of the vocabulary of our language.
it is a rule in sciences begin with a convenient datum a foolishness, that some things are not related from each other. This
happen, because most of discoveries were accidental, as experts themselves admit it. It is human partiality, we predispose that things has not relations, after we
distinguished and were taught extracting. A usual case is lost precious time until someday scientists the opposite ascertain with their enthusiasm,
accidental (again) discovery or observation of newer phenomena. Also it is a same and usual case, experts describe and explain some relations in field of their speciality and in same moment they use
some words, that alone them lead in other fields of knowledge and presuppose knowledge outside from their speciality. Separate example of such a case, we find in modern physics.
A lot of scientific discoveries that accidental happened could have resulted by reasonable
consequence and if we had begun from some different observations.
Innumerable related words express the same thing from an other optical corner, with different relations and behavior. Mum for
the child, grand mother to the grandchild, girl to her own parents, woman to the man, person to the animal kingdom, mother by a different word. When we have
watched how one and same thing acts change with different ways, to be transformed and pass from various phases and different behave under other conditions, then the different words they do
not tangle us. Rather, different words reveal to us possible divergences and their potential interconnections. When, however, we have named differently
and accidentally a multitude of things,
without previously we have observed (carefully) all their ways where are connected, developed and change, then the words reflect delusions.
Similar as thousands mirrors that reflect what we want to approach. Perhaps, the meaning of these words is enough in order to we determine something recognisable and their
name helps in the record keeping. However, their meaning unfoundedly is selected, it is an extract and causes wrong
impressions, non-existent oppositions, foolish queries and twisted opinions.
This variety of vocabulary and the thin differences of meanings can inspire the
man of letters, poets, writers and philosophers and offer an exit for their expressiveness. However, variety of vocabulary cause confusion and manipulation
for reliable compose of our thoughts and for the consistent formulation. Imagine some grammatical and syntactic rules, how much irregular used for
theoretical research, when they allow to express as one concrete thing, something that really exists only as energy or as complicated phenomenon of many
things (an example is the soul and life). According to grammatical and syntactic rules inanimate things separated in male and female gender (example of many
languages) and irrelevant or extreme dissimilar things have a similar name.
One from the more especial examples about inconsistency with lightly use of
notions in Science is the use of term “force” with implied
infinite speed of its transmission. In this particular case, we see not only unfounded acceptance for infinite speed. We still see, that experience can
deceit us, when a concept of a term emanates from unexplained phenomena and when phenomena are not easy to measured. Physics fell in adventures from the
lightly acceptance of infinite speed in applying of physical force. Scientists discovered this mistake after delay and with surprise, that was blindly acceptable over centuries.
Formulas and calculations relative to exertion of force are not reliable for the correct description of all phenomena, if speed or acceleration is infinite and still
they are corrected.
In the cosmological theory (in first phase) of a “Finished Time - Complete Universe” happens this following simple and
When we look carefully in few general words (totality, parts, change, relation, cause,
result, time, distance etc) and we try to understand in more
detail what these words mean, then we reveal some important and suspect coincidences. These different and ostensibly irrelevant usual words can be described
more analytically and be replaced by some other expressions and formulation,
with necessary relations and not randomly.
PHILOSOPHY, PHYSICS & MATHEMATICS
The end of thread, the beginning for the revelation of their common elements and their relations are found when we differentiate the definition
of the abstract word “Universe” and attribute a wider concept. When in the word “Universe” in general and vaguely we include
the totality of things from past until future and not only that exists in our present. If in this definition of
the Universe, we add and say that the Universe is one and same in the limits of a longest total time
(in one period), this concept is the key for the explanation of all big questions of philosophy!
Somebody would say, that with this thinking we cannot find some relation between of things, which we did not know it already. When, however, we begin
analysis of notions of few
expressions and concepts and again we
connect them in basis of the wider definition of the Universe (as a total of things from all times), then we reveal some relations and
traits, which had not passed from our mind. We conclude known theories and explanations
through other path of search, we resolve unsolvable problems and coincide with
empiric observations. After a long-lasting treatment and unfold of
formulations, some coincidences, clues and rational consequences lead to conclusion, that rather it is improbable all these concepts are accidentally connected.
Usually, when coincidences are excessively many and in difficult cases, and all pieces suit, then we suspect
some reason. The explanation for the coincidence and not
accidental fitting is close to what we name “truth”.
Humans can think and formulate opinions about things that exceed their experience, for most distant, biggest and
smallest, about invisible things even the Universe. It's not accidental. The philosophers were not so much deluded and headstrong, as much as they appears
from their inconsistencies, errors and from their difference views. On the contrary, it is usual in scientific thinking to happen some ascertainments for a
smaller number of things than as much as it is allowed or some relations between things are discovered, for which we had predisposed that things are not connected.
Sequence, priority and time where a lot of scientific discoveries happened were not unavoidable
and only from a sudden intuition of few pioneers.
The discovery of resemblances and common elements in the entirety
of things does not astonish the philosophers. The theoretical thought about the existence of structural elements is not an accidental thought. On the
contrary, for a lot of researchers, theorists and thinkers, it was something expected, from ancient years. We
find many attempts for rational description of Universe from the
most ancient years. Of course, some of
these led to astonishing concepts and approached in modern discoveries.
When we speak about the total of things and attempt to give total explanations, we will be not reported in separate and
multifunctional things, where are found near us and nowhere elsewhere. That is to say, it not helps us and it will not be the shortest way if we think about
some plants, specifications of some cars, geophysical map of earth, about the city where we live. The history of human
knowledge has revealed certain phenomena and elements, which are widespread and more frequent means in nature. These are found in larger number of things
and in longer time intervals, for example as the structure of chemical substances are.
The cosmological theory of Simultaneous and Complete Universe is still one such rational attempt by an
original thinking, which exploited some latter discoveries of Physics. Seeing that description for the totality of things and general explanations are reported in their common elements and phenomena, we
should use abstract notions and common expressions, as are time, effect, change and whichever other are essential in order to we think in report and condensed
for many related things. It is predictable, the general notions that describe common elements and phenomena are met notions in specific area of Physics or even other sciences. Nothing strange does not exist in this coincidence and
this indiscriminate and overall view is not absurd or antiscientific.
A summary knowledge on the structure of matter, also some acquaintance in Physics is a requisite in order somebody to watches
and understand the cosmological theory of the Simultaneous and Complete Universe. Apart from the familiarization with philosophy, we needs this briefing in order to we
can think more exempted from some biases, that have taken form from habit of our daily
experience. Therefore, whoever wants learns and watches the theory on a Simultaneous and Complete Universe (an alternative title of the theory) needs knows elementary theory from Physics. It need yet,
somehow to imagine the structure of matter and the different things, as if they were compositions by similar constitutive and dynamic elements (and not only grossly, on the surface and
Konstant G. Nikol