(

KNOWLEDGE &THINKING     |     INNER DIRECTION     |     MAN & SOCIETY     |     PHILOSOPHERS

)

 

header message

 

 

>

  

*

 

*

 

THE BIG IRRATIONALITY IN THE «BIG BANG» THEORY

(Big Bang, the ironic name that was given by the famous astrophysicist Fred Hoyle)

 

 

 

Timaeus in the famous dialogue of Plato. The human logic 24 centuries ago  WITHOUT EXPERIENCE :

 

" At my opinion therefore it should at first we determine the following: what is that which exists always but it does not be born never, and what is born always but never exist. The first thing, somebody can  comprehend logically thinking, because this is always the itself. The second somebody can perceive this without thought, as opinion and belief because it is born and is lost, however it does not exist really, never "

(about Timaeus look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timaeus_(dialogue)

 

The human logic after 24 centuries WITH SCIENTIFIC EXPERIENCE :

" Entire the world with the space was condensed in an adimensional point. Without cause and logic, a dimensionless point that contained the all world in infinite density changed (Big Bang), the space with its dimensions and energy created including the physical laws that determined the development at the initial situation of fiery plasma."

 

We cannot tell about progress in the human thought.

For regression in the ancient season of mythology, it is more likely.

However, the ancient our ancestors had enormous ignorance and today we comprehend and admire their imagination. On the contrary, in our time the knowledge and heritage of human thought are enormous and we can not comprehend and we consider that it is a delirium in modern physics.

 

In later years, the philosopher Spinoza (1632-1677) in his theology, theorem 3: " Things that do not have nothing common between them, no one from these it cannot be reason for the other ".

 

 

???

The statement that all matter of world with the free space were condensed in an adimensional point and the Universe began suddenly exist by sizes smaller than smaller material things! From the most incredible and absurd theories in the history of physical sciences, that exceeds in foolery the geocentric view of world, even the medieval explanation of fire with a substance " phlogiston ". It will be one from the most brilliant examples to reminds arrogance and cowardice in science. A simple thought formulated as title in the introduction of a philosophical book :

" Knowledge without philosophical intellect (not creative and inve­stigatory thought) supplies the ignorance ".

Knowledge can feed the gabble, paranoia, disorientation, confusion and delusion as a young man has cleverly written. The blind confidence even in calculations when they describe relations of things can lead to collective paranoia, if thousands of scientists tolerate and repeat a foolishness for a lot of decades. It is incredible, that today some scientists can to formulate seriously a such foolishness after progress of many centuries in sciences. The fairy tales that we read in ancient religious texts were written with enormous ignorance of nature, but  they are beautiful. The absurd statement in science, that the total of material things with the space of billions of galaxies existed in dimensions of a visible thing, even for only a fraction of second, it is more astonishing than the absurdity, that the Universe began exists from nothing.

It has been said, that scientists often consider the beauty, simplicity and symmetry in a theory as some marks of correctness and apposite approach in their research. The aesthetic criterion and intuitive thinking can guide some scientists in the recovery of truth - “simple logic” as could we name it. In this case of interpretation of the total creation of world with a childish thought about a “Big Explosion”, researchers achieved incredible hat. They ignored simple logic of meanings, ignored their own scientific beginnings and laws also the aesthetic criteria. If this big impasse, with inversion of physical laws, absurdity of meanings, allegorical formulations, causeless explosiveness and disrespect in the history of philosophy, all these caused in them a sense about a “bright” theory... I'm sorry, but this is a delirium !