LET'S TALK WITH FRANKNESS AND WITH
OUR OWN THINKING
THE BASIS OF EFFECTIVE AND RATIONAL THOUGHTS
FOR THE DESCRIPTION AND INTERPRETATION OF THINGS AS A WHOLE:
THE TWO OPPOSITE PROSPECTS FOR THE RESEARCH OF NATURE
Are we living in a disruptive (and incoherent) world, without any limit, with things that coincidentally and occasionally change until
each one to differs of other, without have any common trait? Are we living in a chaotic world, where all things change but the stability and laws are something accidental and a casual
phenomenon (by the exterior meeting of many parts and moreover by microscopic molecules)?
Are we living in a unified world, that has certain decisive limits and consists of things, that are always connected with one and
the same reality, as parts of one and the same Whole, in a united world where is regulated by laws and so as infinite variety of things begins by specifications
of a common total, without eternal balance is destroyed? Are we living in a chaotic world, where stability is something accidental or things change in such
creating mode (periodically, circular, repetitive…) so as the phenomena of timing and balance exist and finally a prospect for things where have a constant
structure and existence, and not a chaos of contradictory molecules? Do we will hide the interpretation of the cosmos in some words, as when we
utter the word " form " that presents the existence of a thing so easy and static? Or do we will observe, that form of a thing is a complicated implementation
with dynamic processes, for which only one physical and reasonable explanation can we give?
Think simply also with your own
The formulation of above dilemma with few simple words shows clearly only two opposite prospects for the human research and for
meaning of life. A lot of phenomena which we believed that are difficult to explained they were much more easily and on the contrary, solutions have been
conquered in science in much difficult questions. Also, it will be proved that until now, the reasons for which research does not reveal many answers in
diachronic queries was certain biases that prevented research. It was the human egoism that influences overall of human behavior and the excessive focus of
human thought on survival and in relationships with other people. Large dimensions of the physical world, that is to say the illimitable limits of length and
time, serve the variety of phenomena and complicated shaping
of things. Nothing other!
The most unforeseen and astonishing of the new theory is not that queries about the
creation of the world are answered. It's not only the fact, that
certain new discoveries throw light in dark philosophical and scientific questions and in particularly questions of
modern physics, which remained unanswered. The most unforeseen and astonishing is that the answers are given for a multitude of phenomena through a minimum and
generic thoughts (unified), which are formulated with the usual vocabulary in some hundreds of pages. With common observations and rational analyses of the most
general concepts, as some ancient philosophers could approach. While, everyone imagined and expected some volumes with the difficult mathematics and the data
processing of a computer!
The physical interpretation of the structure of the Universe and matter does not only
include a lot of solutions on theoretical problems and answers for curious men. Its consequences are not limited in the inquiring region of physics and
astronomy. It will cause
more agitation on questions of human logic and thinking. Particularly for the capabilities and weaknesses of a specialized intellect, questions of
educational system, on leading role of human thinking and information in daily life, of observation in our thought and imagination for research, about the
unanticipated contribution of chance, ignorance, even of errors in thought also in life, even for the human possibility to makes deceit a science and finally,
for destination of a life without thinking or with thinking focused on perceivable things. Finally, life will be revealed in the most close
relation with intellect and the intellect as a trait of the complete and simultaneous Universe, which is presented in our eyes as a free space!
you know, believe or speculate ?
"Knowledge which has our consent and is acceptable because of our
insecurity, in order to we do not appeared illiterates, fools or uninformed or for certain other expediency, it is not our reliable
knowledge. It is our faith, it is hasty certainty or a bet with a lot of probabilities, however no knowledge that differs than religious
Konstant G. Nikol
WHAT THEY DID NOT THINK AND DID
NOT GIVE IMPORTANCE... IN PHYSICS AND PHILOSOPHY IN THE LAST CENTURIES
An example: Think someone who works hard, runs many times and makes
a lot of attempts in order to achieves what an other worker accomplishes rested and more fast. If we wish the result, then we will be not impressed from
what appears more active and more durable. Example 2nd: Think someone employee that brings many customers and money in your shop, while sits for a long
hours· now think an other employee that runs and tries hardly, but the cash machine is empty. Whom do would select? Now, apply the same thought for the
scientific research: What the meaning, if someone solves difficult equations and describes phenomena impressively to us, but it will need to we study for a
lot of years in order to we understand him and while an other researcher has find the same results with language that a student of medium education can understand!
WHY THE CENTRAL IDEA IN THE "BIG BANG" THEORY IS THE BIGGEST FOOLISHNESS IN SCIENCE ! READ HERE
SHORT ANSWERS - BIG SURPRISES !
THEIR PROBLEMS WANT TO BECOME ALSO OUR OWN PROBLEMS
THEY WANT TO HANDLE OUR LIFE IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE IN THEIR AIMS
κοσμολογία, cosmology, in
German: Kosmologie, in Italian and Portuguese: cosmologia, in France:
cosmologie, in Spanish: cosmología, in Russian: космология, in Chinese: 宇宙论, in
Hindi: ब्रह्मांड विज्ञान (), in Turkish: kozmoloji, in Swedish and Norwegian:
kosmologi, in Arabic: الكوزمولوجيا علم الكونيات , in Hebrew: קוסמולוגיה
φιλοσοφία, philosophy, in German: Philosophie, in Italian and Portuguese:
filosofia, in France: philosophie, in Spanish: filosofía, in Russian: философию,
in Chinese: 哲学, in Hindi: दर्शन (tattvadnyaan), in Turkish: felsefe, in Swedish
and Norwegian: filosofi, in Arabic: الفلسفة , in Hebrew: פילוסופיה